Sometimes I forget that while I may live in a relatively tolerant city, it is still a city in Arkansas, and that Arkansas is in the South, and that the South is renown for its intolerance of homosexshuls.
We are lucky in that our library happens to be one of the most liberal institutions in the state. We’re probably the only public institution that offers same-sex partner benefits, but quietly, so as not to freak out the redneck voters, and definitely the only public institution where our many gay employees can be, and are, comfortable being out. I can’t count the number of women dancing together at our last Christmas party!
When I first came to work here, almost six years ago, I was amazed by both the acceptance & the openness. Having been raised by a lesbian, having spent a great deal of my teenage years embraced by her little corner of the “gay community,” and having been violently gay-bashed numerous times in jr. high, I’d grown not only to prefer the company of homosexuals to heteros, but I developed a sizable chip on my shoulder, on behalf of my “family,” and bristled at the slightest hint of homophobic behavior. “That’s my mama, and my Queen Auntie Don you’re talking about motherfucker!” I gauged whether I’d date or even have friendships with people based on their reaction to me outing myself as a child of the gay community. I still do. I can’t tolerate intolerance!
One of my co-workers, some of you may know her as K., we’ll just call her Jane, for the purpose of this post, put up a wonderful & thorough book display for Gay & Lesbian Pride Month. She covered both fiction and non-fiction, took some recommendations from the Queen High Lesbian: Keeper of the GLBT Book Lists, she created a nice colorful banner, and set it up in the display area at the front of the library (no kicking homosexshuls to the display area in the back of the library.) I was very proud of both the display and of her, as it was her first time, and she was a little nervous.
So imagine the collective disgust when only days after poor Jane put up her display, a complaint was emailed to the head of our library (via the webmaster, who disseminated multiple copies to those of us in the know) - detailing his outraged offense at our audacity for not only displaying such books, but for encouraging, nee SHOVING, the gay lifestyle down the throats of the library public.
What the complainant failed to realize, and really, how could he know, is that the head of our library is a lesbian. *cue raucous laughter* Take that, you stupid bigoted motherfucker.
What follows is his email, which has been edited, of course, to provide anonymity even to stupid bigoted motherfuckers, as per the law in our state.
After you’ve finished screaming at the computer screen, keep scrolling for the amazingly calm, reasonable and professional response from Our Fearless Leader, Xena: Warrior Librarian Head.
All names have been changed to amuse and humiliate both the innocent & the guilty.
Greetings Central Library,
I was extremely disappointed yesterday to see the book display you had set up promoting the homosexual lifestyle. While I would really like to rant and rave about this matter, my guess is that it would be much less enjoyable for you. Discretion would seem then to dictate a different course of expression. In that spirit, I would like to set forth some questions:
* Would the library have had this display twenty-five years ago?
* Assuming the answer is “no,” what has happened to change your policy?
* When did the debate on our culture’s acceptance of homosexuality end?
* Who made the decision that it was over?
* Was it the media? Was it Hollywood? The intelligentsia? The American Psychiatric Association?
* Was it when the word “homophobe” was coined and applied to anyone who disagreed with the view that homosexuality was normal?
* Why does it now seem to be assumed there is no place for a serious discussion of homosexuality and that any attempt to question it stems strictly from intolerance?
* How tolerant of a viewpoint is this?
Thank you for indulging me and thank you even more if you are able to seriously consider these questions. It may sound disingenuous but it is not; I have no ax to grind with people who have chosen a homosexual lifestyle. I obviously disagree with their choice but it is just that, their choice. However, when we as a culture begin promoting such a lifestyle (through displays such as yours), I believe we have crossed a critical line. We are now holding up such a lifestyle up as an alternative to the traditional family. In this regard, homosexuality is as wrong as polygamy, bigamy, incest, inter-marriage, etc., all of these harm humanity by hurting the family. Every word spoken, every dollar of benefits given to homosexual “couples,” every piece of legislation passed endorsing their lifestyle, is ultimately a blow against the family. Civilizations that don’t protect the family don’t last very long.
We seem to have come to the conclusion that civilization’s general repulsion of the homosexual lifestyle throughout the ages is simply a prejudice of the ignorant and unwashed, like the ranting racist or people who are afraid of the internet. I believe this to be a superficial analysis born out of convenience and sentimentality as much as intellectual conviction. While societies past and present have certainly had small-minded, large-mouthed people who opposed the homosexual lifestyle, societies as a whole have rejected it for a greater reason, i.e., the well being of society.
Please reconsider the endorsement you are giving to a destructive lifestyle.
Sincerely,
Adolph McHitler (name changed for privacy)
- - - -
Mr. McHitler,
Thanks for your reasonably stated disagreement with one of our current displays.
Some of the questions you pose may not be ones that I can definitively answer, as they are admittedly still open for debate. Your question about who is responsible for the increased societal acceptance of homosexuality, for example, would be an excellent topic for public debate, and one which I would feel inadequate to answer.
The purpose with any of our displays is not to promote a particular point of view, but rather to promote awareness of materials that may be of interest to a significant number of our patrons. This is not the first year (though I don’t remember for how many years) we’ve created a display of materials on this subject matter to coincide with Gay and Lesbian Pride Month, and past displays have gotten expressions of approval and thanks from people who have used them to select books. I will concede that I don’t think this display would have been made twenty-five years ago, as I think that lack of interest in the subject, and the stigma attached to it, would have made such a display of little use to our patrons.
It is never our assumption with any materials we purchase, let alone display, that no one will object to them. There are many subjects which would have little or no representation at all if we used unanimous public acceptance as a criteria for purchase or display. Among the titles in our collection which have been challenged are books on potty training and diabetes, not to mention a vast array of fiction titles. We present a display every year in conjunction with Banned Books Week in which we display books which have been banned by various entities at various times in history. One of our branches will soon host a pre-release party for the newest entry in the controversial but very popular series of Harry Potter books. In each case, we realize and respect that some members of the public will not wish to read the highlighted books, or may in fact be offended by them. Again, our purpose is not to tell people whether they should agree or disagree with the material in any of our books, but to make available items and programs which will promote reading among all the people in our service area.
We respect your right to disapprove of any materials you find in the library, but hope that this explanation of our motivations will ease your disappointment somewhat.
Sincerely,
Xena: Warrior Librarian,
Head of the Main Library